terrorists and leadership

I know the election is over (how could Kerry give up so easily?) but I've been wanting to write about this since the day after Nov. 2.

If you believe the rhetoric of the Bush administration, you would think that Bush is helping to safeguard Americans in the war on terrorism. So, my challenge to that is to ask the following question: If you were attacked by a terrorist, who would you have voted for?

It seems that a lot of Americans (I can't say the majority because a lot of those who voted for Bush did so out of reasons that had nothing to do with terrorism, war, economics, etc.) voted for Bush because he will protect us from terrorist attacks. Well, if that's so, then why did the people who WERE attacked by terrorists vote, overwhelmingly, for Kerry? What am I talking about? Well, simply, the places that were attacked by terrorists on Sept. 11, 2001 voted for Kerry:

• WTC - located in Manhatten, NY - 82% Kerry, 17% Bush
• Pentagon - located in Arlington, VA - 68% Kerry, 31% Bush

So, there you have it. The people on the front lines know that Bush is a bad man and is making us less safe than ever before. Basically, if you believe that the policies of the Bush administration are keeping us safe, you are the fool's fool.